White mulberry

• Rock Creek Park

  38 sightings · Legal to pick: no · see them on iNaturalist

  Look but don’t pick: Rock Creek Park’s compendium bans gathering any fruit, nut, berry, seed or greenery.

• Four Mile Run stream valley (Arlington/Alexandria)

  26 sightings · Legal to pick: no · see them on iNaturalist

  Look but don’t pick: Arlington County park rules (flora shall not be removed or disturbed) and Alexandria’s permit rule both apply.

• Mount Vernon Trail

  23 sightings · Legal to pick: no · see them on iNaturalist

  Look but don’t pick: GW Memorial Parkway sites (incl. Great Falls VA, Theodore Roosevelt Island, Dyke Marsh) designate nothing for gathering.

• Huntley Meadows Park

  20 sightings · Legal to pick: no · see them on iNaturalist

  Look but don’t pick: Fairfax County parks ban removing any plant part without written permission.

• Glencarlyn Park

  15 sightings · Legal to pick: no · see them on iNaturalist

  Look but don’t pick: Arlington County park rules say flora shall not be removed or disturbed.

The calendar counts a study with no figure used here when one of its vitamin, mineral or dietary fiber figures was left out as a dried sample, another part, or for an unclear species, part or basis; figures given per amount of juice are not counted.

• Imran et al. 2010 (counted in the calendar): ash has no FDA daily value; crude fiber is a different measure from dietary fiber, the FDA daily value is for dietary fiber; no FDA daily value; not measured in the cited work: by difference: 'The amount of total carbohydrates was obtained by the difference between weight of the sample taken and sum of its moisture, ash, total lipid, protein, and fibre contents' (Imran et al. 2010, methods); fiber excluded, so not the same quantity as USDA 'carbohydrate, by difference'; not measured in the cited work: calculated: 'The calorific value was calculated by multiplying the values of total carbohydrate, lipid, and protein with the factors 4, 9, and 4' (Imran et al. 2010, methods); protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: basis (fresh vs dry) not stated; magnitudes far above other mulberry data; species, part or state not clear: basis not stated; implausibly high; species, part or state not clear: basis not stated; note the abstract gives Mg range (24±3.51)-(360±4.20) while the text says 240; species, part or state not clear: computed energy; labeled dry weight but value looks like fresh weight; species, part or state not clear: crude fiber method; labeled dry weight but values look like fresh weight; species, part or state not clear: labeled dry weight but values look like fresh weight; basis cannot be trusted; species, part or state not clear: labeled dry weight, but with 81.72% moisture these values look like fresh-weight values; basis cannot be trusted; species, part or state not clear: species and part match, but the state does not: analyzed on dried fruit and expressed per fresh weight by the authors; not a clean raw/fresh value (vitamin C is lost on drying); total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Liang et al. 2012 (counted in the calendar): minerals per 100 g dry weight; no FDA daily value; protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: basis (fresh vs dry) not stated; species, part or state not clear: basis stated as dry weight (dextrose equivalents) but doubtful; assay is not a standard total-sugars measure; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Chen et al. 2022 (counted in the calendar): round-1 source without a basis/part call; species, part or state not clear: species attribution disputed: all 25 samples contain anthocyanins (Table 3; C3G 0.656-4.367 mg/g), i.e. dark-fruited sericulture varieties, and 'Zhongsang 5801', 'Dashi' and 'Jushensang' are the cultivars Liang et al. 2012 assign to Morus atropurpurea; 'Morus alba' here is the authors' umbrella usage, not established as the white mulberry of the dataset; the amount is a range across samples, not one figure
• King & McClure 1944 (counted in the calendar): crude fiber is a different measure from dietary fiber, the FDA daily value is for dietary fiber; no FDA daily value; percent of dry matter only; protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: species not given ('Morus sp.'); could be Morus alba, M. rubra or a hybrid; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Uyak et al. 2024: analyzed through a juice of the fruit, given per weight of fruit: per 100 g fruit (squeezed, filtered juice of homogenized fresh fruit; ascorbic acid test-strip kit read on a reflectometer); fresh basis implied; the amount is a range across samples, not one figure
• Coyago-Cruz et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight (freeze-dried edible part); reported as 'nd' (not detectable); dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight; cell left blank in the table (no value reported); no FDA daily value; no amount given; reported as not detectable
• Saeed et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight
• Negro et al. 2019: analyzed through a juice of the fruit, given per weight of fruit: per 100 g fresh weight (juice obtained by centrifugation; enzymatic kit); no FDA daily value
• Sánchez et al. 2014: analyzed through a juice of the fruit, given per weight of fruit: per 100 g (juice-based HPLC analysis of fresh fruit; fresh basis implied); crude fiber is a different measure from dietary fiber, the FDA daily value is for dietary fiber; dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight; no FDA daily value
• Ali Redha et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: dry weight; unit as printed would mean 45% fat, which is impossible for mulberry, so the unit is probably g/100 g DW; dry or dried basis: per 100 g (dry powder; dry basis inferred by AI); flagged implausible; species, part or state not clear: Table 2 says only 'mg/100 g'; the samples were analyzed as dried powder, so the values are presumably per 100 g dry weight (inference). Several values are implausibly high for mulberry even on a dry basis (K 4358.66, Na 960.19, Fe 31.06 mg/100 g), so treat with caution.; species, part or state not clear: Table 2 says only 'mg/100 g'; the samples were analyzed as dried powder, so the values are presumably per 100 g dry weight (inference). Several values are implausibly high for mulberry even on a dry basis (K 4358.66, Na 960.19, Fe 31.06 mg/100 g), so treat with caution. The white-mulberry K and Ca values continue on the next line ('36.11', '3.15' are their standard errors).; species, part or state not clear: Unit error suspected; not converted. Fatty-acid profile in the same table not collected.; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Eyduran et al. 2015 (other figures from this study are used above): no FDA daily value
• Dhakad et al. 2020 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: oven-dried fruit (dry basis, from the methods); dry or dried basis: percent of oven-dried fruit (dry basis, from the methods); given per amount of juice, not per weight of the fruit: per 100 ml of juice (not per 100 g fruit); no FDA daily value
• Erkinov et al. 2025 (counted in the calendar): flagged implausible; species, part or state not clear: Implausible: the table reports K 1650.913 and Fe 578.170 mg per 10 g, i.e. 16.5% potassium and 5.8% iron, which no fruit contains; the unit is probably wrong (perhaps mg/kg or µg/g of dry matter), and the sample state (fresh or dried) is not given. The paper also calls black mulberry both a variety of Morus alba and Morus nigra. Listed only for completeness; not usable without the authors' clarification.; unit not converted: mg per 10 g (as printed) (per 10 g of fruit sample; fresh or dry not stated)
• Gundogdu et al. 2011 (other figures from this study are used above): no FDA daily value
• Alizai et al. 2003: flagged implausible; given per amount of juice, not per weight of the fruit: fresh pulp/juice without seeds; no FDA daily value; species, part or state not clear: the scanned copy of the paper can’t be read reliably, and its total sugar nearly equals its total solids, which is implausible
• Sánchez-Salcedo et al. 2015 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: dry weight; dry or dried basis: dry weight (table title: 'on dry weight basis'); dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight; protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; the amount is a range across samples, not one figure
• Sangteerakij et al. 2023: basis not clear: percent of fruit as analyzed; fresh or dry basis not stated; carbohydrate has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber; crude fiber is a different measure from dietary fiber, the FDA daily value is for dietary fiber; no FDA daily value; protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: Basis unclear: the table gives % without stating fresh or dry basis, and a moisture of 43% is far below the 82-89% usual for fresh mulberry (the paper’s own introduction cites 84.4 to 89.7%), so the sample may have been partly dried or the figures mis-stated. Values for the fully ripened row: moisture 43.00, crude protein 1.90, total carbohydrate 55.40, fat 1.00, ash 0.20, crude fiber 0.40. Semi-ripened values also given (not collected). Ice-cream product values not collected.; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Othman et al. 2024 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry weight; no FDA daily value
• Beglaryan et al. 2025 (counted in the calendar): species, part or state not clear: The paper says results were 'calculated on a 100 g basis of the fruit' without saying fresh or dry; the flavonoid table of the same paper is per 100 g dry weight and K 1388 mg/100 g is far above fresh-fruit levels, so these are probably dry-weight values. Not converted. Values appear in Figure 2 and are restated in the text. Sugar (13.9%, saccharometer reading) is a soluble-solids reading, not total sugars, and was not collected.
• Ullah et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): carbohydrate has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber; crude fiber is a different measure from dietary fiber, the FDA daily value is for dietary fiber; dry or dried basis: per g of dried, powdered fruit (dry basis inferred by AI from the methods: 'Dry and powdered leaf and fruit samples'); dry or dried basis: percent of dried, powdered fruit (basis inferred by AI from the methods; the table does not state it); flagged implausible; no FDA daily value; protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: M. alba fruit is the 6th value in the row (columns: O. ferruginea A, B; P. khinjuk A, B; M. alba A, B; ...; A = leaf, B = fruit). The fruit proximates are implausible for mulberry (ash 33.4%, crude fiber 38.3%, dry matter 45.93% after oven drying), so treat with great caution.; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Damasco et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): carbohydrate has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber; flagged implausible; no FDA daily value; not measured in the cited work: measured (by difference); protein: the FDA percent daily value for protein must be corrected for protein quality (PDCAAS, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(7)(ii)), which this analysis does not report; species, part or state not clear: Values look implausible for fresh mulberry (moisture 22.60-44.88 g/100 g, total carbohydrates up to 74.40 g/100 g; anthocyanin reported in g/100 g), and the species is uncertain (title says Morus spp.), so recorded as unclear. Wet-season vitamin C is about one-tenth of dry-season.; the amount is a range across samples, not one figure; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Gundogdu et al. 2018 (other figures from this study are used above): no FDA daily value
• Tewari et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): basis not clear: per 100 g fruit; fresh or dry not stated for ascorbic acid (the same table’s phenols are on a dry-weight basis, its anthocyanins on fresh weight); species, part or state not clear: The row reads '221.60c ±0.49 36.07a ±21.22 20.18c ±0.47 1.16c ±0.12 48.02c ±1.05' across lines in the PDF (total phenols, ascorbic acid, flavonoids, anthocyanin, antioxidant activity). Proximates and minerals per species appear only in bar charts (Figs. 1 and 3) and as ranges across the three species in the abstract, so no M. alba-specific values could be read for them.
• Iqbal et al. 2010 (other figures from this study are used above): no FDA daily value; species, part or state not clear: Total sugar (22.381%) is three times the TSS (7.42%) of the same fruit, which is impossible on a fresh basis; the sugars may be on a dry basis or mis-stated.
• Sottile et al. 2017 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: per 100 g dry matter (DM), fresh fruit at full ripening; no FDA daily value
• Hepsağ et al. 2016 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: per 100 g; text says 'mg/100 g', the garbled Table 2 header says 'mg/100 g dry weight'; species, part or state not clear: Basis conflict: the table says only 'mg/100 g', the abstract calls the means 'in 100 g fresh fruith', but values such as K 1055 mg/100 g are about five times typical fresh-fruit levels and look like dry-weight figures. Not converted.; species, part or state not clear: The text sentence continues on the next line '19.86 mg/100 g, respectively.' (urmu, black, white). Table 2’s column headers are mislabeled (three columns all say 'Total Anthocyanins'), so the basis is uncertain.; species, part or state not clear: White mulberry (Morus alba), harvested by hand in Adıyaman province, Southeast Anatolia, Turkey, 5-20 July (year not stated; paper received Feb 2016); kept at -20 °C; cultivated or wild not stated; total fat has an FDA daily value, but the panels show only vitamins, minerals and dietary fiber
• Akin et al. 2016 (other figures from this study are used above): no FDA daily value
• Gharibi et al. 2023 (counted in the calendar): no FDA daily value; species, part or state not clear: Units are inconsistent within the paper: Table 3 heads vitamin C '(mg/g)', the methods say 'milligrams per 100 g of extract', and the abstract says '4.34 mg/100 g'. Sugars are in mg/g with no basis; glucose up to 281.27 mg/g (28%) cannot be fresh weight. Recorded as unclear.; the amount is a range across samples, not one figure
• Karadeniz et al. 2019 (counted in the calendar): dry or dried basis: dry weight (μg/g dw); the amount is a range across samples, not one figure

• Europe PMC: searched 2026-10-09, 791 records; 765 after removing duplicates across databases; 19 candidates by title and abstract; 7 read in full; 5 with figures used
• PubMed: searched 2026-10-09, 551 records; 551 after removing duplicates across databases; 12 candidates by title and abstract; 5 read in full; 3 with figures used
• OpenAlex: searched 2026-10-09, 2209 records; 2133 after removing duplicates across databases; 85 candidates by title and abstract; 30 read in full; 26 with figures used
• Crossref: searched 2026-10-09, 121 records; 116 after removing duplicates across databases; 10 candidates by title and abstract; 5 read in full; 4 with figures used
• J-STAGE (Japan): searched 2026-10-09, 619 records; 616 after removing duplicates across databases; 1 candidates by title and abstract; 1 read in full; 0 with figures used
• USDA FoodData Central (online search): searched 2026-10-09, 1 records; 1 after removing duplicates across databases; 0 candidates by title and abstract; 0 read in full; 0 with figures used
• USDA FoodData Central (downloaded SR Legacy 2018 and Foundation 2026 tables): searched 2026-10-09, 1 records; 1 after removing duplicates across databases; 0 candidates by title and abstract; 0 read in full; 0 with figures used
• All databases together: 4293 records from all databases, 2966 unique, 91 candidates, 33 read, 27 used; 56 not read (paywalled 19, blocked automated access 24, not online 13)
• KCI (Korea), CNKI (China), SciELO (Latin America), CORE, USDA’s AGRICOLA and PubAg, Google Scholar, and national food composition tables other than USDA’s: not searched (October 2026).

The counts are of papers new in this search. Sources found before this search (such as USDA’s entries) were not counted again.

Each database was searched for the plant’s scientific and common names together with nutrient words (composition, nutrient, vitamin, mineral, fiber, protein and others), in titles and abstracts only. Papers that don’t name the plant there, and words not on the list (such as fat, energy and moisture), were missed unless another paper led to them; the AI researchers found some that way.

• Phytochemical studies of white mulberry fruits (Morus alba L.). authors not given 2024; not read: paywalled
• Population and individual multivariate analysis of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry genotypes: applications for breeding, conservation and development authors not given 2021; not read: paywalled
• Immature mulberry fruits richness of promising constituents in contrast with mature ones: A comparative study among three Tunisian species (includes Flamini G) 2017; not read: paywalled
• Comprehensive metabolic profiles of mulberry fruit (Morus alba Linnaeus) according to maturation stage. authors not given 2016; not read: paywalled
• Nutraceutical potential of selected wild edible fruits of the Indian Himalayan region. Bhatt ID, et al. 2017; not read: paywalled
• Chemical properties in fruits of mulberry species from the Xinjiang province of China. authors not given 2015; not read: paywalled
• The Effects of Calcium Chloride and 1‐Methylcyclopropene (1‐MCP) on the Shelf Life of Mulberries (Morus alba L.) authors not given 2014; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Effects of aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment on nutritional components and shelf-life of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.). authors not given 2011; not read: paywalled
• Effects of Treatment with 1‐Methylcyclopropene and Clo2 on the Postharvest Shelf‐Life and Physiological Quality of Mulberry Fruit (Morus alba L.) authors not given 2016; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits Ercisli S, Orhan E 2007; not read: paywalled
• Nutrient and mineral assessment of edible wild fig and mulberry fruits authors not given 2014; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Phenolic composition, antioxidant activity, mineral content and antimicrobial activity of fresh fruit extracts of Morus alba L. authors not given 2014; not read: not online
• Assessment of physicochemical, nutritional, and biochemical diversity of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) genotypes across distinct climatic regions authors not given 2026; not read: the site blocked automated access
• CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, ANTIOXIDANTS AND SUGARS IN WHITE MULBERRY FRUITS authors not given 2023; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Determination of Physicochemical and Mineral Composition of Mulberry Fruits (Morus alba L.) at Different Harvest Dates Farkli Hasat Dönemlerinde Dut Meyvelerinin Fizikokimyasal ve Mineral Madde İçeriklerinin Belirlenmesi authors not given 2012; not read: not online
• Evaluation of selected nutrients in mulberry (morus alba L) varieties grown at Kari station-Thika, Kiambu County authors not given 2014; not read: not online
• Changes in physicochemical properties of mulberry fruits ( Morus alba L.) during ripening authors not given 2017; not read: paywalled
• Comparison of Nutritional and Functional Constituents, and Physicochemical Characteristics of Mulberrys from Seven Different Morus alba L. Cultivars Kim EO, Lee YJ, Leem HH, Seo IH, Yu MH, Kang DH, Choi SW 2010; not read: paywalled
• Organic acids, sugars, phenolic compounds, and some horticultural characteristics of black and white mulberry accessions from Eastern Anatolia Gecer MK, Akin M, Gundogdu M, Eyduran SP, Ercisli S, Eyduran E 2016; not read: paywalled
• Effect of NAA and zinc sulphate on fruit drop, yield and quality of mulberry (Morus alba L.) authors not given 2019; not read: not online
• Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic Content and Selected Physicochemical Properties of White Mulberry (Morus AlbaL.) Fruits Gungor N, Sengul M (per the Atatürk University record; its citation details differ) 2008; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Effect of Drying Methods on Physiochemical Characteristics and Mineral Composition of Mulberry Fruits authors not given 2022; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Determination of Antioxidant Vitamins in Horticultural foods authors not given 1999; not read: not online
• MINERAL COMPOSITION OF STRAWBERRY, MULBERRY AND CHERRY FRUITS AT DIFFERENT RIPENING STAGES AS ANALYZED BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA-OPTICAL EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY authors not given 2011; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Varietal Impact on Suitability and Acceptability of Mulberry (Morus alba) Fruit Drinks: A Comparative Study authors not given 2021; not read: not online
• Preharvest calcium chloride sprays improving physicochemical quality of mulberries (Morus alba L. ‘Chiang Mai 60’) during refrigeration authors not given 2024; not read: paywalled
• Phenotypic diversity among Morus alba var. nigra genotypes as revealed by multivariate analysis Farahani M, Salehi-Arjmand H, Khadivi A, Akramian M 2019; not read: paywalled
• Analysis of Quality Evaluation for Different White Mulberry Varieties authors not given 2015; not read: not online
• Phytochemical profiles of wild blackberries, black and white mulberries from southern Bulgaria Akin M, Eyduran SP, Ercisli S, Kapchina-Toteva V, Eyduran E 2016; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Melatonin postharvest spray influence on white mulberry browning, storage life, and biochemical changes authors not given 2024; not read: paywalled
• Some physicochemical characteristics of black and white mulberry genotypes from Bosnia and Herzegovina authors not given 2019; not read: not online
• Comparison of mineral contents of mulberry ( Morus spp.) fruits and their pekmez (boiled mulberry juice) samples Akbulut M, Özcan MM 2008; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Sustainable Mulberry (Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L.) Production in Eastern Turkey authors not given 2021; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Characterisation of some exotic fruits (Morus nigra, Morus alba, Salvadora persica and Carissa opaca) used as herbal medicines by neutron activation analysis and estimation of their nutritional value authors not given 2011; not read: paywalled
• Composición proximal y propiedades físicas de frutos de siete variedades de Morus alba L. authors not given 2019; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Dynamic changes in pyhsical and biochemical fruit quality attributes of Morus alba L. across multiple harvests: Insights from consecutive seasons authors not given 2025; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Biochemical properties, organic acid composition, and mineral content of black (Morus nigra L.), white (M. alba L.), and red (M. rubra L.) mulberry genotypes authors not given 2025; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Evaluation Study of some Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Red and White Mulberry Fruits, a Local Variety Morus sp. authors not given 2023; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Vitamin, Sterol And Fatty Acid Contents Of Some Edible And Medicinal Plants From East And Southeast Anatolia (Turkey) authors not given 2015; not read: not online
• Utilization of Egyptian Mulberry in Manufacture of some High Nutritional ValueProducts authors not given 2021; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Antioxidant activity and nutritional value in mature fruit of seven mulberry cultivars authors not given 2019; not read: paywalled
• Study on Nutritional Components of Black Mulberry Fruit and Effects on Anti-oxidation authors not given 2006; not read: not online
• Organic Versus Conventional Fruit Production: Assessing Heavy Metals, Essential Elements, and Key Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Profiles for Nutritional Security authors not given 2026; not read: the site blocked automated access
• EVALUATION OF SOME MULBERRY SPECIES AND THEIR SUITABILITY FOR PROCESSING JAMS authors not given 2010; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Content of Heavy Metals in Mulberry Fruits and Their Extracts-Correlation Analysis authors not given 2013; not read: the site blocked automated access
• CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EGYPTIAN MULBERRY (TUT) FRUITS FOR PREPARING PROCESSED PRODUCT AND NATURAL COLOURS. authors not given 2003; not read: the site blocked automated access
• BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON MULBERRY FRUITS AND THEIR METHANOLIC EXTRACT . authors not given 2009; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Pomological characteristics of selected promising mulberry genotypes (Morus sp.) from Northeast Anatolia Orhan E, Ercisli S 2010; not read: not online
• Antioxidant Efficacy of Selected Underutilized Fruit Species Grown in Sri Lanka authors not given 2021; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Ethnobotanical And Nutraceutical Investigation Of Wild Edible Fruits And Vegetables Used By The Tribal Communities Of Lesser Himalayas Pakistan authors not given 2013; not read: not online
• Selection of Mulberry Genotypes from Northern Serbia for ‘Ornafruit’ Purposes authors not given 2022; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Morphological and antioxidant characteristics of mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes authors not given 2018; not read: the site blocked automated access
• Morphological and Chemical Characteristics of Mulberry(Morus) Fruit with Varietes authors not given 1998; not read: not online
• Some physico-chemical characteristics of mulberry (Morus alba, Morus laevigata, Morus nigra) species grown in western Turkey authors not given 2015; not read: paywalled
• Physicochemical properties and phytochemical components of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits with different density at harvest authors not given 2023; not read: paywalled
• Morphological and pomological characteristics of white mulberry (Morus alba L.) accessions Hashemi S, Khadivi A 2020; not read: paywalled